Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2020-05-15 |
| -- | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| -- | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| -- | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is much better than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), with a score of 87.1 against 72.6. The LG Velvet features a really superior processing power than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores. LG Velvet has an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored). Both have a display of the same size.
The LG Velvet counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG Velvet also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG Velvet has a way better battery duration than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 3050mAh.
Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) features a better camera than LG Velvet, because it has a way higher resolution back-facing camera, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.