Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 15 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-16 |
| -- | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 6.95 ounces |
| -- | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored)'s general score of 72.6. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has older 14 version while Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's processor is just as good as the processing unit in Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), and although the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a higher number of MHz cores, they both have a 12 GB RAM. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a little bit smaller display.
The Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) takes just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality pictures and videos, it also counts with a much better video definition and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has 384 GB more internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.