Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 15 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-12-07 |
| -- | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| -- | 7.48 ounces |
| -- | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LTPS |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G 5G has an overall score of 81.5, which is much better than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored)'s 72.6 score. These devices include Android operating system, but the Motorola Moto G 5G has 10 version while Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15. The Moto G 5G counts with an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a little smaller display.
Moto G 5G counts with a way better hardware performance than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has 8 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with 7 more cores. Moto G 5G has much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB.
Motorola Moto G 5G counts with a superior battery performance than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has a 64% larger battery size. The Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) shoots much better videos and photos than Moto G 5G, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.