Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 15 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2016-09-01 |
| -- | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| -- | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold and Gray |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| -- | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z Force is slightly better than the Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), getting a 75.8 score against 72.6. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Moto Z Force has a newer 7.0 Nougat version while Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15. The Moto Z Force has a very superior processing power than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and faster).
Moto Z Force features a much better display than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a quite smaller display. The Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) takes way better photos and videos than Moto Z Force, because it has a much more mega pixels back-facing camera and a way better video quality.
The Moto Z Force features a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Moto Z Force counts with a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.