Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-02 |
| -- | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| -- | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| -- | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is much better than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), having a overall score of 87 against 72.6. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola razr (2020) has an older 11 version while Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15 version. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much greater processing power than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores.
Motorola razr (2020) has an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a quite smaller screen. The Motorola razr (2020) features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) counts with just a little better battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3050mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) captures much clearer videos and photos than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a lot better video quality, a lot larger sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality and a much better resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.