Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 15 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-11-12 |
| -- | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.97 ounces |
| -- | Meteor grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| -- | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a score of 80.3, which is better than the Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored)'s score of 72.6. Both devices we compare here include Android OS, but the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has the previous 10 version while Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15 version. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a lot better screen than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored). Both have a screen of the same size.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a lot better performance than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores. Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) features a bit better camera than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a lot more megapixels back facing camera and a larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a higher image and video quality.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features much more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.