Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-04-10 |
| -- | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 4.94 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.9 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 437 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A40 is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), getting a global score of 79.6 against 72.6. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A40 has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15. The Galaxy A40 has an incredibly better display than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a little bit smaller display.
The Galaxy A40 features a greater storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A40 has a much greater processing power than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores.
Galaxy A40 counts with a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has 3100mAh of battery capacity against 3050mAh. Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) captures way better pictures and videos than Galaxy A40, because it has a much better 7680x4320 video resolution, a much bigger back camera sensor capturing lot higher quality photographs and videos and a lot higher 200 mega pixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.