Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2021-03-17 |
| -- | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.67 ounces |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is way better than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored)'s 72.6 score. The Galaxy A52 has a much sharper screen than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a bit smaller display. The Galaxy A52 features a much better performing CPU than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has 6 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores.
Galaxy A52 features a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a much longer battery duration than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A52, because it has a way more mega pixels back facing camera, a way better video resolution and a bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.