Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-01-31 |
| -- | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.31 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 has an overall score of 87.5, which is way better than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored)'s 72.6 score. Both phones we compare here use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15 version. The Samsung Galaxy A71 features a much better performing CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with 7 more cores.
Samsung Galaxy A71 features a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a bit smaller display. Galaxy A71 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A71 also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A71, because it has a larger back-facing camera sensor, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a lot more megapixels camera in the back. The Galaxy A71 counts with a very superior battery life than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.