Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 4.4.4 |
| -- | 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches |
| -- | 4.06 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 320.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 4.7 inches |
| -- | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 312 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 2.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 11 hours talk time |
| 5.04 | 3.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Alpha is a little bit better than the Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), getting a 76.3 score against 72.6. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Alpha has a more recent 4.4.4 version while Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15, providing the user a couple nice extra features and optimized performance.
The Galaxy Alpha counts with a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a way smaller display. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Alpha, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Alpha counts with a much faster processor than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores and an additional graphics processor. Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) counts with a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has a 3050mAh battery capacity against 1860mAh.
The Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy Alpha, because it has a much higher video resolution and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.