Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| -- | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.84 ounces |
| -- | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), getting a 90.8 score against 72.6. The Galaxy Note 20 has a much greater processing power than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and faster).
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with an incredibly better screen than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a quite smaller screen. Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same video definition, the Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) also has higher video frame rate, a back camera with a way higher resolution and a larger back camera sensor taking higher quality photos.
The Galaxy Note 20's memory capacity to install applications and games is very similar to Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored)'s one, both of them have the same 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy Note 20 counts with a way better battery life than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has a 41 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.