Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| -- | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| -- | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), getting a general score of 98.9 against 72.6. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the previous 13 version and Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15 version. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much sharper screen than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has a quite larger screen.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a way better performance than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), and although they both have 12 GB of RAM memory, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher number of cores (and also faster).
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has a lot less MP back-facing camera and a worse video quality, it also counts with a larger camera sensor providing a better image quality. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a superior battery duration than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has a 48% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.