Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| -- | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| -- | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 2.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.04 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has a global score of 81.2, which is better than the Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored)'s score of 72.6. Both phones in this comparison use Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version while Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15 version. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a bit smaller display.
Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) counts with a slightly better memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much greater performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a GPU and a higher number of faster cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a lot larger sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality, a back camera with way more mega-pixels and a lot higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.