Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2019-08-23 |
| -- | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| -- | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a lot better than the Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), getting an 89 score against 72.6. Galaxy Note10 has a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a little bit smaller display. Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a much powerful CPU than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and they are faster).
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features much more storage for games and applications than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a much larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has a 15% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.