Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2017-09-15 |
| -- | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 6.88 ounces |
| -- | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| -- | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note8 is much better than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), with a score of 83 against 72.6. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note8 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15 version. The Samsung Galaxy Note8 has a way better display than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a little bit smaller display.
The Galaxy Note8 has slightly more memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. The Galaxy Note8 has a much more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) takes way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because it has a lot bigger sensor capturing lot higher quality photographs and videos, a camera in the back with a lot better resolution and a lot higher video quality. The Samsung Galaxy Note8 has a bit longer battery life than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has an 8 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.