Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-02 |
| -- | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.70 ounces |
| -- | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has an overall score of 90.8, which is way better than the Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored)'s 72.6 overall score. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 FE has the previous 11 version and Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15 version. Galaxy S20 FE counts with an incredibly better screen than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a quite smaller display.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a much powerful processing unit than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3050mAh. Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a back facing camera with a way higher resolution, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a larger sensor which offers a better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.