Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| -- | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.83 ounces |
| -- | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| -- | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than the Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), having a 98 score against 72.6. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the older 13 version and Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better performing processor than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), and although they both have 12 GB of RAM, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher number of cores.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way better display than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has a bit larger display. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) and the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G have really similar cameras, although the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a lot lower 108 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, a worse video resolution and a much tinier back-facing camera sensor taking less light and washed colors.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a really longer battery life than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has a 64% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.