Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 13, 12 |
| -- | 2022-02-25 |
| -- | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 8.08 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| -- | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), with a global score of 95.4 against 72.6. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has the previous 13 version and Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15 version. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a lot better looking screen than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored). Both have a screen with the same size.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra and Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) have incredibly similar memory to install games and applications, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has less RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Galaxy S22 Ultra captures slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has a worse video quality and a much lower 108 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.