Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2016-03-11 |
| -- | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge is slightly better than the Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), having a score of 78.1 against 72.6. Both phones we are comparing here have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has 8.0 Oreo version while Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15, so it provides the user a lot of extra features.
The Galaxy S7 edge features a very superior CPU than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has 8 GB less RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores. Galaxy S7 edge counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a little smaller screen. Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) features a very superior camera than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a way larger camera sensor providing a much better image quality, a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera and a way better video resolution.
Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) counts with more memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has a 3600mAh battery size instead of 3050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.