Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2017-04-21 |
| -- | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.47 ounces |
| -- | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| -- | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 is much better than the Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), having a general score of 81.7 against 72.6. Galaxy S8 has a much better looking screen than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a bit smaller display. The Samsung Galaxy S8 has an extremely better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has less RAM, it also counts with 7 more cpu cores.
The Galaxy S8 has just a bit more memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 256 GB. The Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has a 3050mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy S8, because it has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way better image and video quality, a camera with much more mega pixels and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.