Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| -- | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| -- | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), getting an 83.3 score against 72.6. The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a much greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores.
The Galaxy S9 counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a little bit smaller screen. The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a quite bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 400 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy S9, because it has a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a camera with lot more MP and a much better video quality. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 3050mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.