Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-03-12 |
| -- | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| -- | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.3 inches |
| -- | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| -- | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover 5 is just a bit better than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), getting a general score of 78.1 against 72.6. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but Galaxy XCover 5 has an older 11 version while Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15. The Galaxy XCover 5 has a much better performing processing unit than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and they are faster).
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a lot smaller screen. Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) takes way better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a lot higher video quality and a much better 200 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy XCover 5 has a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) features a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 2 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.