Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 12 |
| -- | 2022-06-29 |
| -- | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| -- | 8.29 ounces |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| -- | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a score of 77.6, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored)'s 72.6 score. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS, but Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has the previous 12 version while Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a little smaller display.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has 7 less MHz cores, it also counts with more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) takes greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has a back-facing camera with a lot higher 200 MP resolution and a lot larger sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality.
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has superior battery performance than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.