Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2020-04-04 |
| -- | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| -- | 9.03 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| -- | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is better than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), having an 80.1 score against 72.6. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a really smaller display.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video resolution, a back facing camera with way more MP and a lot bigger camera sensor taking way higher quality photographs and videos. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has a 48 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.