Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-01-31 |
| -- | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| -- | 7.76 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| -- | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is better than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), getting a general score of 81 against 72.6. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy XCover Pro has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15 version. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much faster CPU than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has an incredibly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a little smaller screen. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features better battery duration than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has a 33% more battery size. Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a camera with a lot higher 200 megapixels resolution, a lot larger sensor shooting much better quality photos and a much better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.