Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-07 |
| -- | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), with a 92.3 score against 72.6. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the older 11 version while Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15 version. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much powerful CPU than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has less RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and they are faster).
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a quite smaller display. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3050mAh. Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) captures a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a much bigger camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.