Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-09-18 |
| -- | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| -- | 9.95 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| -- | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored)'s 72.6 overall score. Both devices we are comparing here include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15 version.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has a little bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features an extremely better processor than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), and although they both have a 12 GB RAM, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater number of cores. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a superior battery performance than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has a 48% greater battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has a greater camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a much better 7680x4320 video definition, a larger sensor capturing higher quality videos and pictures and a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.