Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-04-20 |
| -- | 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| -- | 6.70 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| -- | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| -- | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark is better than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), having an 80.4 score against 72.6. Both devices we compare here include Android OS, but Xiaomi Black Shark has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15, counting with a couple nice extra features.
The Xiaomi Black Shark features a much faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores. Xiaomi Black Shark counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a little smaller display.
The Xiaomi Black Shark's storage capacity for apps and games is very similar to Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored)'s one, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Black Shark counts with longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3050mAh.
Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) takes way better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a lot larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot higher 200 mega-pixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.