Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-03-28 |
| -- | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.23 ounces |
| -- | Black and Silver |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| -- | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 is much better than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), having a general score of 82.3 against 72.6. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has the previous 10 version while Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a bit smaller display.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has a really superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with more processing cores. The Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) features a much better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because it has a much better video definition, a way better resolution camera and a much bigger camera sensor capturing way higher quality photographs.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 and Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) feature similar storage capacity to store more apps and games, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 counts with superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.