Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-08 |
| -- | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| -- | 7.83 ounces |
| -- | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is much better than the Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), with an 86.6 score against 72.6. Both phones we are comparing have Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has older 10 version while Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15 version. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a much faster processing unit than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and also faster).
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features an incredibly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a bit smaller screen. Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video resolution, a larger sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs and a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with as much storage for games and applications as the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), both of them have exactly the same internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has 4720mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.