Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 93.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2020-04-21 |
| -- | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Alpine white and Solstice grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| -- | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 13.86 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro has an overall score of 93.1, which is way better than the Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored)'s score of 72.6. Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro has a very superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores.
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a little bit smaller display. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has 256 GB internal storage.
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro captures a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has a way less mega-pixels resolution back camera and a lower video quality, it also counts with a larger camera sensor taking better quality videos and pictures. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro counts with a superior battery life than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has a 48 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.