Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-04-15 |
| -- | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.47 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| -- | 430 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a global score of 81.4, which is better than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored)'s 72.6 score. Both devices we are comparing work with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15 version, offering some additional features.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a quite smaller screen. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features as much storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) one, both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features a much faster CPU than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) and the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE both count with extremely similar battery durations, although the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also has a 1 percent larger battery size.
The Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has a better camera than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a camera with lot more mega pixels and a much larger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.