Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-08-20 |
| -- | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 6.74 ounces |
| -- | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| -- | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is much better than the Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), getting an 82.7 score against 72.6. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has the previous 10 version and Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15 version. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a very superior processing unit than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a way better screen than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a quite smaller screen. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) captures much better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a lot higher video definition, a much bigger camera sensor shooting much better quality pictures and videos and a lot higher 200 megapixels resolution camera.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's memory to store more apps and games is very similar to Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored)'s one, they have equal internal storage. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with better battery duration than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has a 31% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.