Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-09-08 |
| -- | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| -- | 7.58 ounces |
| -- | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is much better than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), with a general score of 81.6 against 72.6. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has 10 version and Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a bit smaller screen.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features just a bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 256 GB. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a lot better performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with more cores.
The Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) captures much better videos and photos than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has a back facing camera with much more megapixels, a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has a 69% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.