Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | Android 13 |
| -- | 2024-01-15 |
| -- | 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches |
| -- | Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 7.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a global score of 77.1, which is a bit better than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored)'s 72.6 general score. Both phones we are comparing here include Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has older 13 version and Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15 version.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a little smaller screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a much better memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1 TB and 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro count with extremely similar processors, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores. Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) takes a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor, they both have a 200 MP resolution camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has a 64% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.