Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-20 |
| -- | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.02 ounces |
| -- | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| -- | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is just a bit better than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), getting a 76.6 score against 72.6. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has the previous 10 version and Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a much more vibrant display than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a quite smaller screen.
The Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has a little bit better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a much greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with more cpu cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a way better battery life than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has a 65% bigger battery size. The Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) features a very superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a much better 7680x4320 video resolution, a way better resolution camera and a much bigger camera sensor taking way better quality pictures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.