Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-05 |
| -- | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8650 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a general score of 81.1, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored)'s overall score of 72.6. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) has Android 15.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a very superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), although it has a bit smaller screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored) counts with a superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a larger sensor providing a higher image quality, a back camera with a way better resolution and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (Rumored), because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.