Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2016-10-20 |
| -- | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gray and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is better than Google Pixel's score of 80.2. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a way lighter and incredibly thinner cellphone than Google Pixel. Google Pixel counts with a really superior processing power than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM and 4 lesser cores (although they are faster).
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better looking display than Google Pixel, because it has a just a little higher count of pixels in each inch of screen, a much bigger screen and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots way better photos and videos than Google Pixel, because it has a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing way higher quality photographs, a bigger diafragm aperture, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a camera with a lot higher 200 megapixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a very superior battery life than Google Pixel, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2770mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.