Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2020-11-19 |
| -- | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Clearly white and Just black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a little bit better than Google Pixel 4a 5G, having a 90.7 score against 87.5. Both phones in this review have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a newer 14 version and Google Pixel 4a 5G has Android 11 version, so it offers some additional features and better performance. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a extremely lighter and much thinner cellphone than Google Pixel 4a 5G.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a much faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much sharper screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a just a little greater pixels density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a quite larger display.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a much better resolution back facing camera and a much bigger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 29% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.