Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2020-10-15 |
| -- | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.33 ounces |
| -- | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 5's 89 global score. The Galaxy S25 Ultra construction is way thinner and incredibly lighter than the Google Pixel 5. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better display than Google Pixel 5, because it has a quite greater pixel number per inch of screen, a quite larger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 5, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 5 has a much more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better camera than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a way higher video resolution, a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution and a lot bigger back camera sensor taking way better quality photos and videos.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4080mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.