Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0 |
| -- | 2015-03-01 |
| -- | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| -- | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 501 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is much better than the HTC One M9's score of 77.7. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, so it gives you some nice extra features. Galaxy S25 Ultra's design is way thinner and incredibly lighter than the HTC One M9.
HTC One M9 has a very superior performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a graphics processing unit and a 64-bits CPU. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a bit more vivid screen than HTC One M9, because it has a lot better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a just a bit higher number of pixels in each display inch and a lot larger display.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a very superior camera than HTC One M9, because it has a much larger aperture, a much higher resolution camera in the back, a way larger camera sensor shooting lot better quality photographs and a way better video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much longer battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.