Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-11-09 |
| -- | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.50 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is better than the LG G7 Fit's 77 overall score. Galaxy S25 Ultra's construction is a lot thinner and lighter than the LG G7 Fit. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has the previous 14 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a bit better looking screen than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a little larger screen and a way brighter display. LG G7 Fit counts with a way better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less cpu cores (although they are faster) and less RAM.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a way better camera than LG G7 Fit, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video quality, a much bigger aperture to capture better low light photos and videos, a back facing camera with a way better resolution and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing way higher quality photographs and videos.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a really longer battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.