Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-20 |
| -- | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 7.76 ounces |
| -- | Holographic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than the LG Stylo 6, having a global score of 90.7 against 76.7. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's design is way thinner and notably lighter than the LG Stylo 6. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the newer 14 version while LG Stylo 6 has Android 10, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features and performance optimizations.
LG Stylo 6 has a much better performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better display than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a higher amount of pixels per display inch.
Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots much clearer photographs and videos than LG Stylo 6, because it has a much better resolution back camera, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos and video, a much bigger camera sensor shooting much better quality photos and videos and a way better video quality.
LG Stylo 6 counts with a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with greater battery performance than LG Stylo 6, because it has a 25 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.