Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-14 |
| -- | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| -- | 6.63 ounces |
| -- | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is a little bit better than the Motorola edge's 89.6 score. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a notably lighter and a lot thinner phone than the Motorola edge. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a more recent 14 version while Motorola edge has Android 10 version, so it provides the user a lot of extra features.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a lot better looking display than Motorola edge, because it has a better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a little bit bigger screen and a higher count of pixels per inch of screen. The Motorola edge counts with a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S25 Ultra, and although they both have the same 256 GB internal storage, the Motorola edge also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola edge counts with a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Motorola edge, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra takes much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola edge, because it has a way better video quality, a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography and video, a lot larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way more megapixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.