Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 12, 11 |
| -- | 2021-08-19 |
| -- | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.70 ounces |
| -- | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro is a bit better than Galaxy S25 Ultra, getting a general score of 92.8 against 90.7. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 20 Pro has the older 12 version while Galaxy S25 Ultra has Android 14 version. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features an incredibly better screen than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because it has a greater pixels density, a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a quite bigger screen.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a way better hardware performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra. They have 8 processing cores and a 12 GB RAM memory. Galaxy S25 Ultra and Motorola Edge 20 Pro feature quite similar memory for applications, games, photos and videos, both have exactly the same internal storage.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots much better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, and although they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a larger aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations, a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and better 30 fps video frame rate.
Galaxy S25 Ultra features just a bit better battery life than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because it has an 11 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.