Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-08-29 |
| -- | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, getting a general score of 90.7 against 81.9. Both phones we are comparing use the same Android 14 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's body is noticeably lighter and noticeably thinner than Motorola Edge 50 Neo.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a display that's just as good as Galaxy S25 Ultra's screen, because although the Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a just a bit worse display pixel density, a bit worse 1256 x 2760 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little brighter screen. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is very similar to Galaxy S25 Ultra's one, both have equal 256 GB internal storage.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a processing unit that's very similar to Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's CPU, and although the Motorola Edge 50 Neo has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a camera in the back with a way better resolution, a bigger aperture to take better photos and videos in low-light situations, a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger camera sensor.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.