Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-16 |
| -- | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 6.56 ounces |
| -- | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro's 86.3 general score. These phones work with the same Android 14 OS. Galaxy S25 Ultra's design is noticeably lighter and noticeably thinner than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a slightly better looking display than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has a higher pixel density, a little bigger display, a brighter display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a CPU that's just as good as the Galaxy S25 Ultra one, they have 12 GB of RAM and 8 cpu cores. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra captures much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos, it also counts with a back facing camera with way more MP, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has just a little better battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.