Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-04-15 |
| -- | 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches |
| -- | 7.30 ounces |
| -- | Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better than the Moto G100, with a global score of 90.7 against 88.9. Galaxy S25 Ultra's design is way lighter and incredibly thinner than Moto G100. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has newer 14 version while Moto G100 has Android 11, so it provides the user lots of additional features.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much sharper display than Moto G100, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution, a little bit higher pixels amount per inch of display and a little bit larger display. Moto G100 has a greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Moto G100 has a way better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better camera than Motorola Moto G100, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a back camera with a much higher resolution, a way bigger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Motorola Moto G100's battery lifetime is just as good as the Galaxy S25 Ultra one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.