Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-11-18 |
| -- | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.13 ounces |
| -- | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is a little bit better than Moto G200 5G, having a score of 90.7 against 86.2. Both phones we are comparing here have Android operating system, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version and Moto G200 5G has Android 11 version, counting with some nice extra features and performance tweaks. The Galaxy S25 Ultra body is thinner and much lighter than the Moto G200 5G.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better looking display than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a higher screen pixel density. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a superior memory to install games and applications than Moto G200 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
The Moto G200 5G counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Moto G200 5G features a battery lifetime that is just as good as Galaxy S25 Ultra's battery life. Galaxy S25 Ultra takes a lot better videos and photos than Moto G200 5G, because it has a lot more mega-pixels camera, a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.