Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-11-18 |
| -- | 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.31 ounces |
| -- | Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is just a bit better than the Moto G71 5G, getting a score of 90.7 against 82.9. Galaxy S25 Ultra's construction is extremely lighter and much thinner than the Moto G71 5G. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S25 Ultra has a more recent 14 version while Moto G71 5G has Android 11 version, providing a lot of extra features and some performance improvements.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with an incredibly better screen than Motorola Moto G71 5G, because it has a better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a little bit larger screen and a little greater amount of pixels in each screen inch. Moto G71 5G features a much powerful CPU than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G71 5G, because it has more internal storage. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better camera than Moto G71 5G, because it has a lot higher 200 megapixels resolution camera in the back, a much better video definition and a bigger aperture.
Moto G71 5G counts with a battery performance that's just as good as the battery duration in Galaxy S25 Ultra.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.